Difference between revisions of "QT Py"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Blwikiadmin (talk | contribs) |
Blwikiadmin (talk | contribs) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[File:tindie-mediums.png|link=https://www.tindie.com/products/27066/]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[FILE:QTPy49_P18254-720px.jpg]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <video type="youtube">iI9lUsVSuF8</video> | ||
+ | |||
== Two Versions of the QT Py == | == Two Versions of the QT Py == | ||
Line 4: | Line 10: | ||
** [[QT Py (SAMD based)]] | ** [[QT Py (SAMD based)]] | ||
** [[QT Py (RP2040 based)]] | ** [[QT Py (RP2040 based)]] | ||
+ | * [[QTPy49|QTPy49 Breakout card]] | ||
== RP2040 vs SAM version == | == RP2040 vs SAM version == | ||
Line 15: | Line 22: | ||
[[file:XIAO_SAM_vs_XIAO_RP2040.PNG]] | [[file:XIAO_SAM_vs_XIAO_RP2040.PNG]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | == QTPy49 Breakout Card == | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[QTPy49]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[file:QTPy49-P18253-720pxV.jpg]] |
Latest revision as of 19:31, 24 July 2022
Two Versions of the QT Py
- AdaFruit and Seeed Studio have SAMD21 and RP2040 versions of the QT Py (XIAO on Seeed Studio) with the same form factor
- QTPy49 Breakout card
RP2040 vs SAM version
- RP2040 is faster (125 MHz vs 48 MHz)
- RP2040 has 2 cores vs 1
- RP2040 has more Flash
- RP2040 has more SRAM
- The RP2040 version is more expensive, but about the same cost if the SAM version is used with an external Flash
- SAMD21/RP2040 Arduino Boards – Which 32-bit Microcontrollers should you use?